The case was continued for further hearings on this issue, after which a Workers' Compensation Law Judge ruled that claimant had violated Workers' Compensation Law § 114-a and, among other things, disqualified him from receiving future wage replacement benefits. In April 2016, it was disclosed that claimant had been placed under surveillance, and the issue of claimant's violation of Workers' Compensation Law § 114-a was raised. Vecchione, Vecchione, Connors & Cano LLP, Garden City Park (Brian Anson of counsel), for Fresh Meadow Power NE LLC and another, respondents.Īppeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed April 12, 2017, which ruled that claimant violated Workers' Compensation Law § 114-a and disqualified him from receiving future wage replacement benefits.Ĭlaimant sustained work-related injuries to his head and face in January 2015 and was awarded workers' compensation benefits. Schwartzapfel Lawyers, PC, Garden City (Sachin Gadh of counsel), for appellant. Before: McCarthy, J.P., Lynch, Clark, Mulvey and Rumsey, JJ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |